
Title text: There's a maximum likelihood that I'm doing phylogenetics wrong.
What about less regular triangles? Scalene ones?
Convergent evolution. Only equilateral triangles are true triangles, the others are completely unrelated to any of these shapes.ratammer wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2024 9:39 am [url=https://xkcd.com/3010/]What about less regular triangles? Scalene ones?
ratammer wrote: ↑ Hoping to find something quotable on this new forum!
ratammer wrote: ↑In both cases the quote is "I'm being quoted too much!"
So basically, triangles are like crabs?chridd wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2024 2:42 amConvergent evolution. Only equilateral triangles are true triangles, the others are completely unrelated to any of these shapes.ratammer wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2024 9:39 am [url=https://xkcd.com/3010/]What about less regular triangles? Scalene ones?
Sabrar wrote:moody: seems to be his usual self. And that's all I can say for now.
Pretty much. And slugs, and ...not sure if trees or plants that aren't trees are what keep evolving. Three-angledness is pretty easy to achieve and is often advantageous.moody7277 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2024 8:54 pmSo basically, triangles are like crabs?chridd wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2024 2:42 amConvergent evolution. Only equilateral triangles are true triangles, the others are completely unrelated to any of these shapes.ratammer wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2024 9:39 am [url=https://xkcd.com/3010/]What about less regular triangles? Scalene ones?
ratammer wrote: ↑ Hoping to find something quotable on this new forum!
ratammer wrote: ↑In both cases the quote is "I'm being quoted too much!"
Yes, if you put some in a bucket, they will keep each other from climbing out in their own attempt to climb out