Re: Animal Kingdom Mafia (Day 1)
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2022 7:40 pm
working on a re-read, about halfway done
especially weird that he seemed vigilant and motivated, double checking voting rules, right off the bat but has now chosen to coast?
Mark, what specifically are you referring to re: ambiguity here? messie's self contradicting position on sabrar?
this is a lot of fire coming from the guy who has proceeded to play follow the pack and seems determined to not profess a single independent thought or take any initiative in this game. where'd your gusto go buddy?phillip1882 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:42 am throwing accusations with no evidence?
vote heuristically_alone
especially weird that he seemed vigilant and motivated, double checking voting rules, right off the bat but has now chosen to coast?
this slot is just going to grow into a bigger and bigger problem as the game goes on without a serious change of coursephillip1882 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 04, 2022 10:02 pm (apologies, missed the bold requirement)
vote heuristically_alone
early shading of sabrar here, ick
sabrars early reactions to messie and boom here, if sabrar has real experience playing with boom which this seems to imply, we should be taking this take seriously. His easy going response to messie's early shade tracks with his flip and it looks like hes trying to playfully get messie to show more of their hand here with this gesture
Town flipped heury signaling a strong scum ping from messie's early shade throwing at sabrar
Town sabrar explaining why boom scum pinged early for him
Town sabrar with the impressively early townread on the town's flipped PR. Given what he expresses here, and my review of mark's D1, townleaning on Mark
super ick response here, doesn't even engage the point being made, trying to play off dodging the question as just joking around
hate this response, feels like the response of someone afraid to walk into a trap and get caught TMI'ing when any town player can just reason through the issue mathematically to see how another townie might be speculating on balance. shooting an immediate question back to sabrar's instead of trying to answer it leans defensive/scared scumplay
weird reach out to messie specifically here, might be an attempt to have light but non-notable interaction with a buddy so as to not be entirely conspicuous
sabrar calling boom out on a preconceived notion re: his reads
messie committing to the initial shade throw here. they seem awfully concerned about sabrar's vote on them, pings self-pres. weirdly goes out of their way to comment on boom's non-responsive pagliacci joke or whatever. focusing again on votes on their slot by asking heury for reasoning on their vote, again very self pres focused
sabrar calling out messie's shade for being baseless, I don't think messie comes out looking good at all in their early interactions with sabrarSabrar wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 8:31 amYeah, because I'm known for being patient and not refresh the page every minute when I'm expecting role pm-s to be sent out. I'm sure you have a GoJoe post about that saved somewhere.
You're fully aware that I don't switch often. It simply didn't merit a vote.
It feels like your two halves wait for each other before posting your combined posts. I'm not about to tell you how to play but don't you feel this restricts the information you can convey?
not sure we every got a real response to this from messie? if we did someone please link
I think this post looks very good for mark. Not content to just be grouped with someone he has no reason to trust, very townie. Scum would be happy to be placed in a nice "these two prob not buddies and both prob not scum" pairing in early game, no reason to push back.Mark_Cangila wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 2:41 pmThis seems incredibly sure for so little content from me (I've been at work and school). And why rule out us as buddies specifically? I don't think we interacted
Do scum have daychat? I checked the rules and the word chat was used, but IDK if that refers to scumchat too.Eido wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 11:08 am Ok so, random coffee thought. I've been thinking about this post:
Scum!Phillip, being new and all, probably seeks this type of guidance from the private chat ? They would have a buddy and a mentor after all.phillip1882 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:15 pm so since i already vote do i still have to post every day?This just seems pointlessly vague to me. I guess it might be a gag but still I don't love that ambiguity for the sake of ambiguity.
Mark, what specifically are you referring to re: ambiguity here? messie's self contradicting position on sabrar?
this post is straight garbage all around
sabrar calling it out for being garbageSabrar wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 3:59 pmPlease explain how you came to that conclusion.
- up until that point you haven't interacted with messie at all,
- messie posted exactly once, a totally NAI introductory post in which they have not interacted with you
- outside of my RVS I have interacted/mentioned messie exactly once, in that post I expressed no suspicion towards them.
There was simply no reason for you to think that I would consider messie and you the most suspicious pairing.
this actually looks really good for a town!phillip argument because it seems like sabrar knows what hes doing and get a lot of focus on him in early game with this crew. if he is scum hiding being a follow the pack noobie strat, then him going messie here over town!Sabrar is a good look when both choices were viablephillip1882 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 6:59 pm i decided to vote
vote: messie,
as he'she is the most common choice, besides sabrar
messie continuing to be obsessed with only people voting for them or talking about them, screams self pres. also internally contradictory to be saying they have this strong early read on sabrar off some weird contrived post timing meta tell, and then when pressed they backpedal and say they're going to "evaluate their content as a whole." Did anyone see that happening? I sure didn'tmessie wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 10:54 pmOk. How do I merit keeping your vote?
Because he was waiting for the game to start when he should have been asleep.
No, which is why I will be evaluating his content as a whole. Woof.
skeptical bessie.PNGheuristically_alone wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 1:18 pm Forgot that I DO have a read on messie. Hence the vote. Still only treating as one entity though.
Reasons you find me scummy?phillip1882 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 6:59 pm i decided to vote
vote: messie,
as he'she is the most common choice, besides sabrar
boomfrog "NO U FIRST"ing town!sabrar here, trying to shake him off and pressure flip as sabrar is starting to sink his teeth in. He's literally trying to burden shift to town!sabrar here to avoid having to reverse engineer a read he doesn't really have cuz lolscumboomfrog wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 12:19 amYou first. You haven't answered my question or my implied question at all.
1) Was I right?
2) If not who was near the bottom of your list?
Bonus question:
Was your fos on me serious? (I assume yes, you are always serious). What kind of first post did you expect from me?
just a reminder that boom deliberate undermined my TMI bait here by trying to signal to everyone that it was TMI bait despite clearly being aware that that was the purpose of it
my cynical position right now is that with doctor dead and sabrar, seemingly a strong player/town leader, being a sitting duck, becomes a go-to scum target regardless of flip implications because even in a worst case they might feel they can 1 for 1 trade off sabrar and let the remaining mate just carry to endgame without sabrar in to solve.Wam wrote: ↑Mon Mar 07, 2022 1:24 pm @sabrar can you detail your Heury read more?
I'm leaning this way.
vote messie
I dont get the fos for not seeing something in the OP especially as it was added later. I had completely missed it as well.
Cycnical sucipous view says messie is worried about sabrar as they have the best meta read on madge and bessie. But I maybe being too cynical.