What I'm trying to say is I thought your push on me felt more natural, you had reasons based on the content of my posts(this is what I meant by real analysis. You ask several people about it, the people you ask don't seem to bite, then you pivot bessie, with the only reason I can see that Wam dropped out + Heury's vote. My mistake on meta, I forget it has multiple meanings, in the above case, I meant using things that could be borderline considered out of game(reasons for someone dropping out, reasons why someone wouldn't believe a player isn't in the game). I personally think its a stretch to say someone dropping out = that slot is probably scum. Changing who you think is sus is totally fine, but I don't like that I felt your case on me was stronger than your reasoning for Bessie, but you still pivoted. Might just be because I don't have a full readslist from you yet, so I only know your theorized scum pair, and then your top town read.EGW wrote: ↑Thu Apr 24, 2025 3:04 pm Deadbanana: I'm not stretching though? That's also not part of my reasoning for scum reading you. Using meta is fine, in fact I encourage it if it helps people read players better. You mention real analysis, can you explain what you mean by that? Also finally, why don't you see Heury's play as scum play? Why do you strongly town read it?
Re heury:
I've made several posts on this, I'll give a brief overview and link the prior posts that come to mind, and you can followup with any questions you have, picked up my fiance for lunch soon, so that'll give some time.
Previous Posts on heury's vote:
viewtopic.php?p=92642#p92642
viewtopic.php?p=92672#p92672
viewtopic.php?p=92881#p92881 - see after where I say "To steal Mak's format"
viewtopic.php?p=92965#p92965
Quick Summary of thoughts outside of just vote logic:
I think Heury's followup to his vote is town indicitive. townHeury would take the gamble, on the belief they could get a confirmed town. When I had the kerfluffle on Bessie, Heury didn't get involved, because they wanted reactions, they also seemed genuinely bummed about that kerfluffle, which makes sense from their town POV. They wanted to gauge reactions, and get a confirmed town, my efforts hurt that. You can also see most of their views come from the reaction to the bessie vote.
Furthermore, they've been more natural, and less validation seeking to me than in the previous scum game, their answer to my question on moody and greedy was honest, and didn't seek to justify what I saw as an odd read.
TLDR: Vote analysis + post analysis = Heury prob town. No paranoia on the slot because only Bessie can trust fall them today.
I also feel you saying I "strongly town read it" is a misrepresentation. When my heury take aways are:
Deadbananas0 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 24, 2025 3:19 am
I simply thing that its >rand town instead, additionally, I like most parts of Heury's posts after, I feel it is a bit hyperbolic to say all game, when its mid day 1. I don't have a reason to be paranoid on my Heury read today, I'm always analyzing, but only one person can trust fall Heury, so they are at the bottom of my scared of meter for the day.
This is the second time I feel like you have overstated my read on Heury, see italized part of first quote.Deadbananas0 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 23, 2025 8:44 pm Ultimately, even if Heury hadn't voted Bessie, I would not be willing to vote today, this is a slot I would like to see how it progresses over time.