Page 66 of 88
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:04 am
by JC_DADDY25
Gluelock wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:00 am
bessie wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 2:22 am
JC_DADDY25 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 2:12 am
It wasn't, and I'm surprised you're blowing it off the way you are.
Yes interesting how Seven is answering for/defending Gluelock. Its like when he hijacked my question to somitomi.
Providing their own recollection of the event is hardly defending or hijacking. I think its interesting that one of your first posts is addressing this rather than the bigger conversation about mass claiming. JC's contribution to the exchange feels paired but they're not both town.
I feel the same way about you and Seven after your lamegambit.
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:06 am
by AdumbroDeus
system.out.println("
JC and Bessie
If this wasn't a weird looking setup I wouldn't want mass claiming til toMorrow.
But this is a weird setup. Also why I wanted laser and Mak's opinion as sanity checks first (and yours Bessie), but moody has already started which limits the utility of waiting.
");
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:07 am
by bessie
Gluelock wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:00 am
bessie wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 2:22 am
JC_DADDY25 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 2:12 am
It wasn't, and I'm surprised you're blowing it off the way you are.
Yes interesting how Seven is answering for/defending Gluelock. Its like when he hijacked my question to somitomi.
Providing their own recollection of the event is hardly defending or hijacking. I think its interesting that one of your first posts is addressing this rather than the bigger conversation about mass claiming. JC's contribution to the exchange feels paired but they're not both town.
You read my post. Are you going to answer the questions I asked you?
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:08 am
by bessie
AdumbroDeus wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:06 am
But this is a weird setup. Also why I wanted laser and Mak's opinion as sanity checks first (and yours Bessie), but moody has already started which limits the utility of waiting.
Ok. After Gluelock replies to my post.
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:12 am
by Gluelock
bessie wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:07 am
Gluelock wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:00 am
bessie wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 2:22 am
Yes interesting how Seven is answering for/defending Gluelock. Its like when he hijacked my question to somitomi.
Providing their own recollection of the event is hardly defending or hijacking. I think its interesting that one of your first posts is addressing this rather than the bigger conversation about mass claiming. JC's contribution to the exchange feels paired but they're not both town.
You read my post. Are you going to answer the questions I asked you?
What post? You made a lot of them.
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:13 am
by JC_DADDY25
Gluelock wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:12 am
bessie wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:07 am
Gluelock wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:00 am
Providing their own recollection of the event is hardly defending or hijacking. I think its interesting that one of your first posts is addressing this rather than the bigger conversation about mass claiming. JC's contribution to the exchange feels paired but they're not both town.
You read my post. Are you going to answer the questions I asked you?
What post? You made a lot of them.
Didn't you just say she hasn't posted much?
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:14 am
by Seven
i want a hotdog
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:15 am
by Seven
bessie wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 4:48 am
@Seven Why George? Why not Boom?
George was scumreading me and I wanted to talk to him about it + prove my claim.
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:15 am
by AdumbroDeus
System.out.println("
bessie wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:08 am
AdumbroDeus wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:06 am
But this is a weird setup. Also why I wanted laser and Mak's opinion as sanity checks first (and yours Bessie), but moody has already started which limits the utility of waiting.
Ok. After Gluelock replies to my post.
I didn't ask you to claim yet, I'd actually prefer you claimed later than my proposed order cause I still think you're town but I wanted to incorporate broader perspectives.
I just meant your opinion on claiming now, which I appreciated.
");
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:15 am
by JC_DADDY25
Seven wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:14 ami want a hotdog
With chili and cheese?
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:16 am
by JC_DADDY25
AdumbroDeus wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:15 am
System.out.println("
bessie wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:08 am
AdumbroDeus wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:06 am
But this is a weird setup. Also why I wanted laser and Mak's opinion as sanity checks first (and yours Bessie), but moody has already started which limits the utility of waiting.
Ok. After Gluelock replies to my post.
I didn't ask you to claim yet, I'd actually prefer you claimed later than my proposed order cause I still think you're town but I wanted to incorporate broader perspectives.
I just meant your opinion on claiming now, which I appreciated.
");
I'll think about claiming if Bessie claims
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:21 am
by Gluelock
JC_DADDY25 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:13 am
Gluelock wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:12 am
bessie wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:07 am
You read my post. Are you going to answer the questions I asked you?
What post? You made a lot of them.
Didn't you just say she hasn't posted much?
:facepalm:
In the last couple hours they have posted a lot...
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:21 am
by bessie
Gluelock wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:12 am
What post? You made a lot of them.
viewtopic.php?p=53766#p53766
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:22 am
by Gluelock
Honestly I can't.
Unvote: Bessie
Vote: JC
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:26 am
by AdumbroDeus
System.out.println("
JC_DADDY25 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:16 am
I'll think about claiming if Bessie claims
I'd like a former commitment before asking Bessie claim now.
Also
unvote cause I don't want anyone accidentally hammering. But consider my vote effectively on JC for current elim purposes.
");
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:27 am
by JC_DADDY25
Formal?
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:29 am
by bessie
Adum, please unvote on a separate line, like this:
Unvote: Seven
Wait, am I supposed to claim now? Actually I think it might be time. I have a night result.
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:34 am
by moody7277
Unofficial votals:
Seven (2)--Mak, JC
bessie (1)--LG
JC(2)--Seven, Gluelock
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:34 am
by AdumbroDeus
System.out.println("
bessie wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:29 am
Adum, please unvote on a separate line, like this:
Unvote: Seven
Wait, am I supposed to claim now? Actually I think it might be time. I have a night result.
Unvote
Fair.
I'd like a commitment from JC, but I'd be willing to have you claim if they will.
Suspected you had an interesting result but wasn't positive and didn't wanna draw attention to it, but if we're doing this now no no point in hiding it.
");
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:45 am
by Gluelock
You really ought to break the daily bark into 2 pages, and start with the most important piece as your headline.
I don't meticulously document every players undulating opinions of all the other players. That would be way too cumbersome. But the posts you linked don't explain the full picture.
ffs you linked a scenario where you literally vote seven immediately after they voted you. So the original question is still valid.
bessie wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 1:59 am
Gluelock wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 2:52 am
Also, in my mind you’re one of those low posters so this all just feels off to me.
Please elaborate on how it feels off to you. Or are you just slinging mud to see if anything sticks?
Here's the thing, your tempo is such that all of your posts come in shorter bursts, followed by long swathes of time until you make another post. There's nothing wrong with that, I'm the last person to say that its bad. But regardless, what that results in is a low presence. Which is why when i say it feels off, its because you are effectively just the "pot calling the kettle black." Ultimately, it just feels like a misplaced ad-hominem.
Gluelock wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 3:25 am
Btw
Vote: Bessie
Between the contradiction being uncovered by adum and seven and what I feel to be an unfounded stance around seven, your slot needs some actual pressure.
Please point out the contradiction that earned me your vote, because I think I missed it.
And I do not feel pressured by your vote.
[/quote]
Its cute that you think I thought it was about me at all.
viewtopic.php?p=53639#p53639
That post there is what I was referring to. Contradiction might have been the wrong word, but just hints at a suboptimal strategy that I wouldn't expect from a player with your level of experience.
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 6:02 am
by AdumbroDeus
system.out.println("
I need to go to bed because I have a dentist's appointment at 8 am (est).
But would appreciate if we could come to an agreement where JC claims if Bessie claims and he makes good on it.
Also would like @somi's claim whenever they hop on.
");
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 7:41 am
by LaserGuy
AdumbroDeus wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 2:12 am
Basically trying to figure out if we can be confident moody isn't Human.
I think he's a fairly safe. As I suggested, I don't think it's a full clear because one scum bussing and one scum almost bussing is a thing I've seen before, but IDK I feel like humans going with an everyone bus all the time strategy is a little... odd? Especially given at very least on they wouldn't have been able to plan it out in D1.
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 7:48 am
by LaserGuy
bessie wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 2:13 am
LaserGuy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 19, 2023 6:35 pm
Uh, okay, bessie is really obviously EGW's buddy.
Bookmarking this post! I may be referring back to it for years!
I'm not quite sure what to make of this reaction and I'm just going to kind of put in a pin in it for now. I guess I appreciate you actually acknowledging this post since nobody else seemed to.[/quote]
Why?? It would be beneficial for mafia to have a serial killer in the game. A serial killer is not on town’s side. This is one of those basic misunderstandings that I don’t think you’re capable of and therefore you must be scum.
Hmm... I think in this particular situation where there is probably only one human left, they would need to keep a hypothetical SK alive since they are so weak in the day phase. Generally I would feel that mafia want to kill SK as much as Town does. Humans have clearly been given the tools to hunt the alternate scum given their powers we've seen.
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 7:53 am
by LaserGuy
AdumbroDeus wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 6:25 pm
@Everyone: thoughts on massclaiming toDay? My concern is since it's 3-2 imo, it's likely we have to nail scum continuously from ToMorrow on to have a realistic chance of winning and having one extra lynch is useful for piecing out contradictory claim.
My initial feeling is that next day would be better. If nothing else, I'd be worried about how little time we have left to get claims in the way that they need to be most beneficial.
Re: HaiLOWEEN 2023: AI apocalypse
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2023 7:56 am
by LaserGuy
AdumbroDeus wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 6:43 pm
System.out.println("
Seven wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 6:30 pm
I say if anyone agrees on claiming just go ahead in their next post. Ordering always takes forever. Alternatively, I’m content with just going in whatever order you give Adum. You’re town leader. Tell us what to do senpai
I like sanity checks, which is why I wanna get Laserguy, Make, and Bessie's opinions before it. I'm fine with going without Mak
The whole point of claiming is wanting to be able to CC scum. Here's my proposed order. I'm weighing my thoughts about slots but taking into account my read of the average sentiments towards slots.
Somitomi
Makhaira
JC
Bessie
Moody
LaserGuy
Gluelock
Adum
");
I'm fine with this order. I'd want to see JC/Mak/bessie before I'd consider claiming anything this phase. Curious why somi is first.