boomfrog wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:07 pm
AdumbroDeus wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 7:18 pm
boomfrog wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 6:46 pm
Oh, I thought this was wrong but I reread my PM carefully and you are right. Woomp woomp again. Madge's claim was impossible.
Incorrect actually. I can't say if Maotelus was in the game what his LOC and Shepard alignments would be cause I'm not sure, but with that name he'd be from Zestiria and that's a damn good argument that the entire point of the name change was asserting his identity therefore he should only be considered allied with velvet if named Laphicet.
Maotelus also makes perfect sense for a miller.
If someone from both games existed I'd assume the cop role would not imply an exclusive OR. But maybe that assumption is too strong.
I probably could've worded it a bit better, but the intention was closer to main game.
So Maotelus would be Zestiria but Laphicet would be Bersaria. Similarly Seraph Eizen would be Bersaria but Dragon Eizen would be Zestiria. "Both" positively identifies a few characters, 2 of whom are definitely town, 1 of whom is probably town, and one who is town in Bersaria and an obvious non town compatible Indy in Zestiria.
I think it creates a situation that allows for more creative fakeclaiming if results are given before Shepard/LoC alignments are claimed. Understand, I was going for a similar power level to a tracker, just in a flavorful way, you can similarly try to creatively work around a tracker, while still allowing for "if mafia gets hit by both, they're screwed".
Somi did ask and I did clarify that for characters from multiple games, they'd have to use their judgement.
EGW's role only checked LOC alignment so it didn't have to worry about both.
But that's why I went for it like I did, only giving one main alignment gamewise, and characters that were Bersaria had clauses to positively identify themselves as such in their role PMs.