There's really no winning when it comes to Miller. I can understand this.
madge wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 5:41 am
teh bubbles scumreading heury for piling on mak's vote reeeks of omgus. what kind of pants-on-head scum player goes "OH GREAT A CHANCE FOR ME TO PUT A SECOND VOTE ON A PLAYER EARLY ON DAY ONE IN A 15 PLAYER GAME, THAT WILL CLINCH THE VICTORY FOR THE SCUM TEAM". Nobody. If a wagon forms then we got something work critically examining.
My biggest issue is the hyperfocus on timestamp? Scum are not going to coordinate to do things one after the other explicitly becauseTehBubblez wrote: ↑Sat Jan 18, 2025 7:06 amThis was posted only 2 minutes after Mak voted for me, and after I posted a single time. Mak said he RV'd me which is fine, but this with no follow up, reason, or answer to it is suspicious, because that isn't an RV. And like I said in the post addressing it, I didn't say it was a full bandwagon, just way too cautious of a "Hey me, too!" kind of post for my liking. Running along side a potential bandwagon to look like they are doing something.
you'll always get reads like this.
But I also don't understand/certainly don't like Madge wanting to write off "this could be suspicious" for heur at all, just bc it's early behavior and doesn't have a strong instant impact. Scum sowing discord early and getting somebody read as suspicious isn't "clinching the victory" but it's at least setting something up for later down the road! And in a large game they need that!