Albeit with an nonstandard confirmation post, typical first 2 posts from Bessie. Nai
The hippocrisy!
Going back to boomfrog's vote, It feels really weird for boomfrog to be so vocal so early about a serious read. >:/
The hippocrisy!
Gives off the vibe as though TehBubblez thinks all those RVS votes are final but at the same time they acknowledge that they are aware of the nature of D1.TehBubblez wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 4:28 pm As for D1 stuff, I'm never good with it
I know pretty much nobody here soooooo I'll vote closer to deadline lol
Very strong conclusion to draw from an 'accepted light early meta read'. Could have been in jest but doesn't feel that way, more like a justification for a later read.
Weird statement given they already claimed to be an experienced player.
I can imagine the scenario where scumbuddies talk about how to perceive a particular vote on one of them. I cannot imagine the scenario where after one of them assured the other that it was just a friendly handshake and nothing to worry about, scum would feel the need to jump in and 'defend' their buddy, deliberately using the same phrase.
Noting it for now. Not inherently scummy imho but I'd like to see how it develops.
I know I'm not bessie! But we always go through this madge your much better at this game than you ever give yourself credit for!madge wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 7:40 am
I'll do a proper post tomorrow, unless I don't. D1 is so performative and I'm pretty convinced that any ability to read this is well beyond me.
@Bessie have I ever made a good read, myself? an actual read, not like, mechanics analysis. I don't recall it ever happening, but you somehow have a photographic memory of 10+ years of mafia stuff (I'm another who started on xkcdia in 2012, hi)
Having been caught by you on a.confirmation post many many years ago they are always boring to make sure they are NAI.
Given this is a zesty game, I think vanilla is an endangered species. OTOH, Cynical View thoroughly approves bessie's reaction to your question.
Sabrar wrote:moody: seems to be his usual self. And that's all I can say for now.
Oh, this was more of a "speaking from the perspective of understanding Mak and Bubblez's initial votes." Voting is the only guaranteed action we've got and can get reactions that help with deductions. So, I like do understand the concept of random voting early on bc it can yield results, I just also don't think they should be dismissed as only fishing bc they're "more random" bc people lovvvvvvvvvvvvve to be cheeky. (I'm still scarred from a game where my mafia leader winked that they were the mob boss and got day killed in the first half a page. Every post counts.)bessie wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 6:24 amWhy did you feel you “gotta vote somebody”?Bop wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:02 pm Yeah my current read on this situation is I don't think Teh Bubblez's defensiveness at early day 1 votes is inherently scummy, but I also don't think Mak's doubling down is either. It feels like town butting heads but I'd love to hear more before really settling on that. Gotta vote somebody and all that and we have two pages of info (and not even every player yet).
And tbh, the longer I think of it, heuristically_alone's early finger of suspicion is almost more suspicious to me than any of the voting-casting aspersions with less attachment than a vote but more oomph than musing.
So for now I'm gonna
Vote: heuristically_alone
I hadn't-but I don't know that a second vote is a level of heat that's dangerous in a 15 person game-be it an apparent faux pas of RVS or not.heuristically_alone wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 1:45 amThe audacity and injustice of such a vote! Have you not considered that they already had a vote so why would I place a second vote on a player during the RVS phase?Bop wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:02 pm And tbh, the longer I think of it, heuristically_alone's early finger of suspicion is almost more suspicious to me than any of the voting-casting aspersions with less attachment than a vote but more oomph than musing.
So for now I'm gonna
Vote: heuristically_alone
No, I meant it! See "people love to be cheeky, every post counts" above. My paranoia that I'm missing something in these games in unmatched. It was light in tone, but I want it on the record if it helps me make sense of things later.
Oh, this rules. Can't wait to see how accurate this is on a re-read.
I think I'm currently there as well? Like that specific line of questioning threw me but it felt earnest. I'll probably return to it when I've got more to go off of than gut there.
God I'm never a fan of the "magician setting up the trick" genre of post. Always uneasy bc it's inherently based on information we don't have.
What were you expecting to learn from this? And what prompted you to ask moody in particular?ahippo wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 7:20 pm Yeah, that's kinda the response I expected for that question. Very understandable. Still, hasn't much changed my opinions on anyone. Which at this point are almost universally "Gee, honestly, no clue." Y'all seem to know each other's styles much better than I.
This interaction is super weird but FWIW I had the same impression of ahippo's vote on moody so it could be coincidence/groupthink. I kinda agree with Sabrar that this is too on the nose to be staged.
Generally revealing role info early in the game is considered anti-Town because it helps scum optimize their night play, with minimal benefit to Town.ahippo wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 8:02 pm Honestly, I'm doing a lot of catchup on what the vibes are like. I really don't like being cagey and dodging direct questions. Is it suspicious to claim a role D1? Is it considered, like, rude? Or bad play? I mean if it is bad play, I could just own up to being a bad player.
I can't speak for the meta game of the forum but to try to get somebody else to claim a role in D1? That could make them a target depending on what it is I would say it's at best risky.ahippo wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 8:02 pm Honestly, I'm doing a lot of catchup on what the vibes are like. I really don't like being cagey and dodging direct questions. Is it suspicious to claim a role D1? Is it considered, like, rude? Or bad play? I mean if it is bad play, I could just own up to being a bad player.
Right, I wouldn't consider people claiming their own role early as scummy. But even if you're a townie fishing for information, you're at best letting everyone else on the side gain something too.LaserGuy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 8:15 pm Claiming your own role early in the game isn't necessarily alignment indicative (personally, I tend to consider unprompted claims to be much more likely Town than not), though some would argue it is poor play.
Still doesn't answer my question though. Given that you didn't know this information, what were you hoping to learn from asking this of moody?
Yep you should not have claimed that, but this is how we learn, don't sweat it, it's not the end of the world. Ideally you'd have said, "it's something related to my power" and dropped the conversation. But what's done is done. I recommend targeting someone you think is townie, but not necessarily the towniest person on your list just so scum don't know exactly who you are targeting. (and don't target me )ahippo wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 8:42 pm I will point you to the fact that I explicitly did NOT ask for role. I simply asked "Do you have a power?"
Why Moody? Honest answer, when he voted for me, I just found it very endearing and wanted to ask someone I thought would answer. Vibes are all I've got right now.
Why do I care if Moody has a power? I can double a person's use of that power, once per night, only twice in the game, and on separate nights. Realizing now that if I do pick Moody, then that's an extra target on him, so ... yeah, it's useless if my target dies.
I'd probably just be better off using a random number generator to pick my target. I trust blind statistics more than my own intuition at this point.
I have no idea what you are talking about. Can you go into more detail please? Ideally with people's names so I know who you are talking about.JC_DADDY25 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 6:54 am Checking in later than I expected, but I have to say it was a pretty good read. The whole handshake thing was fishy, but the replies after are what stand out to me.
Why is that?heuristically_alone wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 7:05 am Going back to boomfrog's vote, It feels really weird for boomfrog to be so vocal so early about a serious read. >:/
Dang it. This is sincere. Bop is town. (or maaaybe he's scum who's already confident that there's another scum team, but probably town.)
I thought it was pretty obvious I was talking about Bop and ahippo in regards to the handshake, as far as the replies after I'm talking about everyone else's reaction to not only the situation, but the conversation and explanation in regards to the two of them using the same wording.boomfrog wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 8:49 pmI have no idea what you are talking about. Can you go into more detail please? Ideally with people's names so I know who you are talking about.JC_DADDY25 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 6:54 am Checking in later than I expected, but I have to say it was a pretty good read. The whole handshake thing was fishy, but the replies after are what stand out to me.