Daily bark.
madge wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 3:00 am
bessie did you miss playing with me me me me me me
I miss playing with everyone in down times now that we don’t always have a game going.
I missed you more than some others because you didn’t play in the previous game.
I miss BoomFrog the most because Is BoomFrog.
Theallieza wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 4:46 am
Is my excitement that palpable?
Not this. Try again.
Theallieza wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 4:58 am
You don't feel the same about madge or somitomi?
Yes this is it!
Confirmation post initial analysis. Everyone’s confirmation post is acceptable. No confirmation posts contain game content including but not limited to RVS votes, buddying, and rhetorical questions to establish early towniness. No posts contain deliberate or accidental slips.
Confirmation post deeper analysis.
somitomi – Acceptable format. If I had to make a woof-grr list based on only confirmation posts, I might give him the slightest town lean because he wasn’t worried about conforming. But this isn’t enough to move him to an early town lean.
Madge - There is no alignment-indicative information that can be deduced from Madge’s confirmation post. Madge probably doesn’t even remember my absurd fondness for analyzing confirmation posts. And even if she does, she almost certainly wouldn’t let it stop her from posting exactly what was in her mind at that moment. Madge does enjoy playing scum more than town, but I think the excitement can also be from just playing after a break and getting to interact with everyone (read: getting to talk about herself to an audience). So I currently consider Madge’s confirmation post to be neutral.
Gluelock, JC, Fred – Neutral for now. I don’t think these players have played enough with me to deliberately alter their confirmation posts. Note: they could have been advised to confirm in a certain way by a partner in chat.
Heury, moody, EGW, Makhaira, Wam – Suspicious. They know me well and may have confirmed as they did not to draw my attention. Note: I’m pretty sure Wam has said before that he’s posted a neutral confirmation post not to draw my attention, but I can’t remember the game. It was on xkcd.
Theallieza – For other players, the single exclamation post would not be enough for me to move them from their default “suspicious” or “neutral” category (default determined by factors discussed above). For Theallieza, I get the feeling that the exclamation post is purposely teasing me. A very subtle poke but a poke nonetheless. And I don’t think they would do this as non-town. Note that this analysis is specifically for Theallieza and there is no other player in this game to which this would be applicable. Wait. No... there is another.
Seven – Suspicious Grr. See Theallieza.
Seven wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 8:17 am
It can be inferred from your response that you and Madge are unpaired. This requires several steps of reasoning that I do not wish to expend cognitive resources on conveying.
Noting this for now.
Seven wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 10:02 am
EGW is a dancer. It is unfair that I am able to read his alignment off of a single post (if you do not believe this, see AI mafia), so I will be stepping away for the remainder of the day in order to allow EGW to play the game and his team to gain a foothold.
Noting this too.
moody7277 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 11:32 am
bessie's response to theallizea's confirm post is funny considering the mostly non-serious stance that exclamation point=scum in those.
Please clarify. Do you mean funny peculiar, or funny haha?
I was completely serious. See above.
Theallieza wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 7:57 pm
But I think this error comes from Town more often than not.
Is this in reference to EGW’s error or to something else?
Back later. I will be available this weekend and Monday. It is a holiday weekend in the United States.