boomfrog wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2023 10:19 pmSeven wrote:Unrelated, why were you ready to end Day 0 so soon? I find it interesting considering that your intro post was about being busy.
Wagons weren't going to change so no real information was being generated. If we had infinite RL time I decreased our win chance, but since we don't I'd rather cut some stagnant content. And, as a bonus, I wanted bessie to have a weekend to post analysis of D0 before D1 got too hot.
I think you jumped the gun on that assumption. The wagons were still being formed, activity just wasn't hyperactive. The s team was also waiting on you for the responses to your question so we could be let loose. It seemed sudden that you were ready to end the day because not everyone had yet responded to your question and you had no follow-up. It makes me wonder if scum!you was just eager to get Role Cop locked in. When I was reading over the previous game, I had a similar sort of antsy-eagerness when I was attempting to get the roles I wanted locked. You're usually much more patient when you have set things in motion to analyze (as with your what roles would you give town question), but I think that patience and analysis is missing here.
boomfrog wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2023 10:19 pm
I do think bessie's slip narrows her to only scum if buddies with you, me or fonti.
I love you, and I agree. You're actually my top suspect right now, and bessie's odd behavior is reinforcing that view. I have a draft regarding my initial suspicions of you (I was first pinged by your intro posts) that I've been saving. I wanted to see more from you though before putting you on the defensive and preventing town!you from doing his thing.
fontisian wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2023 7:50 pmAlso, Zen, are you immitating my playstyle?
I'm not. I'm not sure I have a grasp of what constitutes a Fonti playstyle. I've been partially imitating bessie: long multi-quote walls, once a day. I was even posting during her posting hours. My goal was to have an identical post count as her (so I was excited when she made 3 posts one weekday night, giving me some leeway) but I've since given up on it as it's too inflexible. The style I am playing closest to is Hari Seldon in
this game:
Sabrar wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2023 9:38 pmI don't agree with Seven that his role-consideration has to be necessarily from a scum pov but he is votable.
I don't think this was me btw. Also why use my reasoning for not voting Fred or Mak and then proceed to shit on my abilities in the same post smh.
Sabrar wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2023 10:32 pm
[3] + [4] You and I have a very different definition of 'lying'. Example:
Seven wrote: ↑Sat Oct 07, 2023 5:04 pmThough I do actually have a day vig, but I cannot use it if I vote.
I would classify that as lying, you would not.
That's not correct. You omitted the rest of the quote:
Seven wrote: ↑Sat Oct 07, 2023 5:04 pm
Though I do actually have a day vig, but I cannot use it if I vote. I'm trying to decide which one I want to use today, vig or vote. Vig or vote...hmmm. This is a lie of course. Just like the cake.
--
Sabrar wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2023 10:32 pmI would imagine you know what obtuse means. Why would you claim otherwise? it just doesn't make sense. Or I just don't understand the joke in a written form.
I inferred its meaning and made a joke. (If it's important, I really didn't know what it meant. If you need evidence, I'm not sure what the game was, but Bessie used the word before and I responded in kind but used it incorrectly. I believe it was Crossover but I'll have to look it up.)